In order to add some objective trust value for each object (Evidence, Intelligence, Person, etc.), a "Trust Score" will be assigned. This score will be evaluate subject to public criteria denoted and evaluated on a case-by-case bases. ## Criteria Scoring is conducted manually via a set of critera subject to the object content. - [Google Sheets Scoring Matrix](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CUarxE7P1cPwgWXwJzzeWnZGm1c6Wp2Ttazdt3VPM_s/edit?usp=sharing) ### Evidence and Intelligence Scoring Category 1: **Source Credibility** 1. **Expertise**: The evidence is from a reputable and knowledgeable expert or authority in the relevant field. 2. **Reputation**: The source has a track record of providing accurate and reliable information. 3. **Independence**: The source is unbiased and not influenced by conflicts of interest or financial incentives. 4. **Citations**: The evidence includes references or citations to other reliable sources, supporting its claims. Category 2: **Methodology and Data Quality** 1. **Rigorous Methodology**: The evidence is based on a well-designed and appropriate research methodology. 2. **Data Collection**: The data used are comprehensive, relevant, and collected from reliable sources. 3. **Data Analysis**: The analysis of the data is sound, transparent, and unbiased. 4. **Validity and Reliability**: The evidence is trustworthy and can be replicated to yield consistent results. Category 3: **Consistency and Replicability** 1. **Consistency**: The evidence aligns with existing knowledge and is not contradictory to well-established facts. 2. **Replicability**: The findings can be replicated by other researchers or individuals, strengthening its reliability. Category 4: **Transparency and Openness** 1. **Transparency**: The evidence is presented clearly and comprehensibly, leaving no room for ambiguity or confusion. 2. **Openness**: The source provides access to the raw data, methodology, and any additional information to allow for scrutiny and verification. 3. **Peer Review**: The evidence has undergone peer review by qualified experts in the field, increasing its credibility. ---- ### Witness and Person Scoring Category 1: **Credibility of the Witness** 1. **Veracity**: The witness has a reputation for being honest and trustworthy. 2. **Observation Skills**: The witness has demonstrated keen observation skills and attention to detail. 3. **Memory Reliability**: The witness's memory is considered reliable and consistent. 4. **Lack of Bias**: The witness does not have a personal bias or vested interest in the outcome of the testimony. Category 2: **Corroboration and Consistency** 1. **Corroborating Evidence**: The testimony is supported by other credible witnesses or additional evidence. 2. **Internal Consistency**: The testimony is consistent within itself, without contradictory statements or claims. Category 3: **Context and Plausibility** 1. **Contextual Understanding**: The witness demonstrates a good understanding of the events or circumstances surrounding the testimony. 2. **Plausibility**: The testimony aligns with what is known or expected in similar situations and does not seem far-fetched. Category 4: **Cross-Examination and Repeatability** 1. **Cross-Examination**: The witness's testimony holds up under scrutiny and questioning. 2. **Repeatability**: The witness can repeat the testimony consistently without significant discrepancies.