---- ## Basic Information - **Name**: Gary Voorhis - **Aliases**: N/A - **Date of Birth**: [Not publicly available] - **Nationality**: American - **Occupation**: Former U.S. Navy Petty Officer, Fire Controlman ## Background - **Biography**: Gary Voorhis served as a Fire Controlman and Combat Information Center supervisor aboard the USS Princeton during the [[📜 USS Nimitz Incident]] in 2004. He was directly involved in tracking the UAPs on the ship's advanced SPY-1B radar system and witnessed these objects over multiple days. His testimony is particularly valuable as he was responsible for the maintenance and operation of some of the most sophisticated radar systems in the U.S. Navy at the time. - **Education**: - U.S. Navy Technical Training - Advanced Combat Systems Training - Aegis Combat System Specialist - **Employment History**: - U.S. Navy Fire Controlman (2000-2006) - USS Princeton (CG-59) crew member - Combat Information Center supervisor - Currently works in technology sector ## Online Presence ### Media Appearances - Featured in multiple UAP documentaries - Regular participant in UAP discussions and panels - Co-founder of UAP Media Group ### Social Media - Active on various social media platforms - Frequent contributor to UAP discussions - Advocates for government transparency ## Contact Information - **Professional Contact**: Through UAP Media Group - **Media Inquiries**: [Professional email available through website] ## Notable Events ### USS Nimitz Incident (2004) - Primary radar operator during the incident - Monitored UAPs on SPY-1B radar system for multiple days - Witnessed objects performing impossible maneuvers - Involved in system diagnostics and verification - Confirmed radar system was functioning properly - Observed data being removed by unknown officials ## Key Statements 1. On radar tracking: > "These objects were dropping from 80,000 feet to 50 feet in a matter of seconds, which should be impossible." 2. On system reliability: > "We checked the system multiple times. It was working perfectly. These weren't false readings." 3. On data removal: > "After the incident, two individuals came aboard and removed all our radar data and recordings." ## Notes - Highly credible technical witness - Direct access to advanced radar systems - Multiple days of UAP observations - Verified system functionality - Witnessed data confiscation - Maintains consistent testimony - Corroborates other witness accounts - Technical expertise adds credibility - Advocates for transparency and disclosure ## Related Research and Topics - [[📜 USS Nimitz Incident]] - [[🔭 UAP Phenomenon]] - [[🎬 FLIR1 Video]] ## Significant Contributions 1. **Technical Documentation**: - Detailed radar system analysis - Technical verification of equipment - Documentation of multiple day observations 2. **Public Awareness**: - Consistent public testimony - Technical explanation of capabilities - Education about military systems 3. **Historical Record**: - Key witness to data removal - Documentation of chain of events - Verification of system capabilities